Is it possible that sex can destroy your life? Nowadays, we are still speaking of sex-addiction. But where are those sex-addict people?<\/p>\n
In Spain, when a TV program makes a special report on this so-called \u201cillness\u201d, the \u201cvictims\u201d do not appear, or if they do, their faces are hidden. They paint the picture of a \u201cdisease\u201d and a shame in our society with the main characters explaining how sex has ruined their lives.<\/p>\n
But can sex really grip a person that completely? What is true and what is wrong in this statement?<\/p>\n
I am going to be very clear: sex does not grip a person and is not addictive at all. Obviously, this sentence seems to be an opinion just like any other. But I am going to argue why I do not agree with the fact that sex-addiction exists: there are determined addictive psychological profiles.<\/p>\n
This does not mean that sex can be addictive. It means that some persons can be addicted to a lot of things (alcohol, gambling, shopping, etc…)<\/p>\n
In that sense, sex is not dangerous at all; it is a specific addictive psychology which can use sex in a wrong way. An example: a knife is not dangerous if it is between the hands of a \u201cnormal\u201d person. It turns into a weapon in the hands of a murderer. This fact does not prevent us from using knives in order to cut our meat for dinner.<\/p>\n
Nevertheless, as far as sex is concerned, we do not use the same logical arguments.<\/p>\n
Did you know that in Spain the most important addiction which exists is the addiction to\u2026 our cars? Of course, nobody speaks about it, while there is a terrible traffic jam blocking our way to work, everyday.<\/p>\n
However, since sex has always been \u201cbad\u201d, a \u201cproblem\u201d instead of a value, there is an interest in showing this human activity as a dangerous one which can even destroy forever the life of those who suffer from \u201csexual excess\u201d.<\/p>\n
But what does \u201csexual excess\u201d mean? Some people are very keen on \u201cmeasuring\u201d the times you \u201cdo it\u201d, the times you masturbate per day. This is ridiculous. It is like comparing the appetite. Some people need to eat a lot to feel well, others have very little appetite. Both groups are perfectly normal.<\/p>\n
The fact that famous people like Michael Douglas, David Duchovny or Jude Law declared themselves as sex-addicts does not help us to attain a different viewpoint on this matter. I think that they were more addicted to the eroticism of power than anything else.<\/p>\n
According to physicians, those with a clear addictive psychology lose their freedom to make decisions unaffected by their state, have no control over their life, risk their jobs, their families, etc\u2026<\/p>\n
In general, what is really important to know is how the addicted person feels (if they suffer from their attitude). If they suffer, it will always be due to the gaze of the others. If not, this person should not be considered an addict.<\/p>\n
When a man is an overweight person, we call him a \u201cfat<\/em>\u201d man, in a pejorative way. If it is a woman, we speak of a \u201cfat<\/em>\u201d woman. As you can see, we use the same adjective to describe both. In the case of the so-called \u201csex-addiction\u201d, we do not do the same.<\/p>\n What is the male equivalent term for \u201cnymphomaniac\u201d? It is amazing because in 99% of cases, people do not know what to answer.<\/p>\n